How much of a threat are returning Daesh fighters to Great Britain?
Most Western Daesh fighters who have returned to their home countries will probably not engage in terrorist activity. However, those who stayed loyal to the terror group as its so-called ‘Caliphate’ collapsed likely remain committed to Daesh’s ideology and hostile to the United Kingdom. While abroad, the threat these individuals pose to Britain is marginal. Those who succeed in returning to Britain will face sanctions, including criminal prosecutions. However, the difficulty of securing convictions, and the limitations of monitoring and deradicalization programmes mean that these individuals will continue to represent a potential threat for the foreseeable future.
By Eden Stewart, Senior Analyst and Callum Yourston, Analyst: Risk Awareness Team – Solutions
How much of a threat are returning Daesh fighters to Great Britain?
“While the vast majority of returnees are unlikely to engage in terrorist activities, a minority will almost certainly retain the intent to conduct or facilitate atrocities.”
The Turkish offensive into northern Syria last October saw Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) abandon its positions along the country’s border, including at several detention facilities which held captured Daesh fighters and their dependents. This raised the spectre of mass escapes by detained fighters, amongst whom are roughly 2,000 foreign (i.e. non-Iraqi or Syrian) terrorist fighters (FTFs). Shortly after beginning its Syrian incursion, Turkey announced that it was to deport the over 2,200 foreign Daesh members which it held. These developments underscored the long-running concerns over the threat FTFs pose to their home countries.
The precise number of Britons held either by Turkey or the SDF is currently unclear. Roughly half of the 900 individuals who travelled from the UK to join Daesh had returned by the end of 2017, with a further 200 estimated to have died in the region. Only a handful are believed to be in Turkish custody, and fewer than 100 are estimated to be in SDF-run camps, with women and children ac-counting for many of these. This suggests that around 200 British Daesh members remain at large, either in the Middle East, in other Daesh ‘provinces’ in North Africa and South Asia.
Despite the large number of British FTFs who have al-ready returned to the UK, the focus on those still ‘in theatre’ is understandable. Many of those who returned prior to 2018 will have become disillusioned with Daesh or the reality of life in a warzone. Furthermore, most will have returned knowing that they would be subject to police investigations and potentially criminal prosecutions. These individuals will probably have disengaged from violent extremism, even if they have not entirely disavowed radical beliefs.
Those still in the Middle East will be, for the most part, the most committed of FTFs and are less likely to have rejected Daesh’s authority or ideology, and as such, they represent potentially the greatest threat to the UK. Those in a position to do so are likely to go into hiding in Iraq and Syria, or to travel to other areas of the world where Daesh has a presence. From here, many will seek active combat roles and therefore represent a negligible threat to Great Britain. However, some will likely attempt to direct or instigate attacks from abroad.
Are British fighters a threat to the UK while overseas?
While terrorist ‘instigators’ enjoyed considerable success from 2014, the attrition of Daesh’s communication capabilities, improved intelligence, and the damage done to the group’s brand have reduced its ability to incite or direct attacks remotely. The involvement of a small number of fugitive British FTFs in propaganda and incitement efforts is unlikely to materially increase the frequency of attack planning in the UK, unless accompanied by a wider revitalisation of Daesh’s information operations.
Those FTFs who do return to the UK are a more pressing concern. It is unlikely that fugitive FTFs will be able to return to Britain undetected, given the UK’s strong border security and the resources devoted to tracking and identifying FTFs. However, returning FTFs, even when deported by regional authorities, may prove difficult to prosecute. Only one in ten of those who had returned to the UK by the beginning of 2019 had been successfully prosecuted, largely due to the difficulty of gathering sufficient evidence from conflict zones. The recently passed Counter-terrorism and Border Security Act, which makes it a criminal offence to enter or remain in designated areas, may improve conviction rates, but some returnees will probably to avoid jailtime nonetheless.
Returnees who cannot be prosecuted can be subjected to Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures (TPIMs) and Temporary Exclusion Orders which require suspects to periodically report to police, and restrict their movements. These measures may go some way in deterring suspects from engaging in extremist activities, and those considered the greatest risk will be subject to more intensive monitoring by police and MI5. However, as demonstrated by recent events, aspiring terrorists can plan, resource and execute low-complexity attacks in very short timeframes, without their intentions becoming known to authorities. Therefore, while risk management measures will probably be effective in stopping more sophisticated multi-person plots, they are unlikely to succeed in preventing attacks which employ more rudimentary methodologies.
Will they impact the future frequency and severity of attacks in the United Kingdom?
Given this, the Government’s reluctance to repatriate FTFs detained abroad is understandable. However, it may be obliged to accept the return of at least some of the Britons currently held in the Middle East. While the vast majority of returnees are unlikely to engage in terrorist activities, a minority will almost certainly retain the intent to conduct or facilitate atrocities. Although their capabilities will be limited by the suppressive effects of counter-terrorism efforts, unsophisticated attacks will prove hard to prevent, and more complex plots cannot be entirely discounted. Furthermore, those executing such attacks may be disciplined combat veterans, hardened to violence.
We assess the number of ‘die-hard’ FTFs who have actually returned to the UK to be low, and therefore the frequency or severity of attacks is unlikely to markedly change. However, an influx of such individuals would likely present a major challenge to security services, particularly in the medium-term, as controls are relaxed and resources are reallocated.
If you would like to speak to someone at Pool Re Solutions Awareness Team about this report, CLICK HERE, leave a message and youTalk-insurance will pass your enquiry on.
Authored by Pool Re
Pool Re’s purpose is to enable the UK insurance market to offer terrorism cover to any commercial property that requires it. Central to this is the integration of Pool Re’s cover with the underlying property policy which ensures that there is no gap in the cover provided.
Pool Re was designed to insulate the taxpayer from potential financial losses arising from acts of terrorism. It has achieved this effectively, to date paying £635m in respect of 13 claims arising from certified terrorism events in the UK since our establishment. It has never called on the Government’s guarantee.
By providing foundational stability at a reinsurance level, Pool Re has created an environment for the commercial market to re-establish itself, following the market failure in 1992. This stability creates and sustains access, liquidity and confidence to generate the conditions for the private market to gradually write a growing portion of terrorism risk.
Helping UK businesses build resilience against terrorism risk is a priority for Pool Re who have developed SOLUTIONS an in-house centre of excellence created to support Members and policyholders better understand risk awareness, modelling, and management. They have also invested in a range of initiatives with Government security and intelligence agencies to provide tools such as an information sharing platform.
- 19 Nov 2020
- 9 Nov 2020
- 4 Nov 2020
- 2 Nov 2020
- 19 Oct 2020
- 12 Oct 2020
- 8 Oct 2020
- 1 Oct 2020
- 30 Sep 2020
- 10 Sep 2020